GORDON REALLY HAD GONE BODMIN THIS TIME
Dear Editor,
I am sure that many of us saw the woe-begotten face of poor Gordon as he was interviewed by a no longer supportive BBC interviewer that morning, the day after the British People told him where to go.
What most of us will not have been aware of, is the truth of the reception he had in the Good Ole US of A, but you know how bad news gets out, however hard you try to suppress it and we are learning fast about the truth of the EU, so it is no surprise to learn how the Americans viewed Our Gordon when he went over there recently, all blown up with his own Ego, to tell them what to do.
It seems they were less than impressed.
Apparently, he, and his brilliant ideology about “Going Global”, wasn’t received quite as he thought it would be.
He might be able to fool the UK media, but there is obviously no way he is going to do the same in the USA.
Irate reports have filtered through the EU British Censor so that we now learn that he has been daft enough, to suggest to the Americans that they ditch their own “Declaration of Independence” and replace it with a “Declaration of Interdependence”.
After what has been described as his “tedious, hour-long speech”, which had to take place within the cloistered walls of Harvard’s Kennedy Centre in case he should be booed, descriptive words are flying around over the webwaves like “impudent”, “outrageous”, “oppressive”, “ponderous” and “silly”, not to mention a good few more which I will leave to the imagination of the reader.
It beggars the imagination to think that any British Prime Minister really could be stupid enough to actually go over to America and attempt to tell them to join with him, and no doubt by implication, the EU, by giving up their national sovereignty.
You see the Yanks think a lot to the idea of an “independent nation not subservient to any outside control” – rather like millions in Britain, really, but apparently Our Gordon has some idea of what he calls, “responsible sovereignty,” which he defined as accepting what he calls our “global obligations.”
It seems the Americans have more in common with we Brits, than most of us have been thinking of late.
Get this then chaps, it is also reported that Mister Brown was preaching “new global rules,” “new global institutions,” and “global networks.”
Of course the Americans, in response, are not slow to point out that Gordon’s “global rules” will no doubt include massive U.S. cash handouts and opening U.S. borders to the world.
His reiteration that “the globalist future is ‘irreversible transformation’”, and that he wants to “transcend states” and “transcend borders” as he builds the “architecture of a global society.”
The reader must forgive me for thinking that he really has “gone Bodmin”, this time, because, for a man who doesn’t even practice democracy in his own country, he is a bit daft to try to preach “global democracy” over the Pond where they so obviously value at least their own brand of it.
The damning comment has been made that Americans are aware that Gordon Brown has already refused to allow the British people to vote on whether or not they want to accept the EU Constitution (Lisbon Treaty) and thus be ruled by the EU – no doubt the first step on his visionary road to Global Government.
Perhaps the UK Independence Party is right after all, and it really is time that we, in Britain, governed ourselves again.
TESS NASH
Chairman
UK Independence Party
St Ives and the Isles of Scilly
http://www.ukipcornwall.org.uk/letters-to-the-editor/gordon-really-had-gone-bodmin-this-time · 96 days ago
Letter to the Editor - Post Offices
Dear Editor
I read this morning, about a particular type of “convenience” store in Japan, where everything is available, including toilet facilities.
Apart from the WC (which no doubt in case or urgent need would be gladly furnished by most) I think we are talking about the Village Post Office and Stores.
So the answer is – ask Gordon Brown why he is closing them?
TESS NASH
http://www.ukipcornwall.org.uk/letters-to-the-editor/letter-to-the-editor-post-offices · 96 days ago
'One Cornwall' - The Planned Unitary Authority
Dear Editor,
The attempts to set up the Unitary Authority in Cornwall in place of the tried and tested means of democratic government , is dangerous.
It is dangerous because has bypassed democracy and refused The People of the County of Cornwall their rightful “say”.
The result is chaos, and hundreds of right arms not knowing what the other hundred left arms are doing.
It is a clear recipe for disaster.
I wonder if Sir Alan Sugar would set up a nation-wide company in the same way?
No government has ever been elected in the UK, to change the whole face of our national government without the permission of The People.
Read More:
http://www.ukipcornwall.org.uk/letters-to-the-editor/one-cornwall-the-planned-unitary-authority · 129 days ago
Affordable Housing?
Dear Editor,
How many innocent members of the public thought, like I did, that it was only their own County that had this awful allergy of an ‘affordable homes shortage’. I thought it was a disease that Cornwall possessed especially as my County Council were always stressing the level of damage caused by second home owners and low incomes. It had me believing that everywhere else in the country there were an abundance of houses coupled with high wages and very few residents in social housing.
Well just how gullible do you think I was – I took the bait, hook, line and sunk to the bottom of despair.
Once again our Government has fooled us all, in fact they have been extremely clever in creating this need for affordable homes which releases them from having to build social housing. It is out of the same mould as the ‘Lets get everybody to University’ scheme whereby unemployment figures will look good and the Government creates additional income through the loans facilities.
Read More:
http://www.ukipcornwall.org.uk/letters-to-the-editor/Affordable+Housing · 129 days ago
A letter to the editor
Dear Editor,
Our readers are probably not aware but last summer the EU decreed that all organic food produced or processed in Europe must bear a compulsory EU logo. This decision – part of yet again new European regulations – will supposedly give assurances of precisely what people are buying. However, Soil Association, the UK’s leading environmental organisation campaigning for sustainable, organic farming and human health thinks different. They say that far from providing ‘assurances’, the new logo brings the prospect of confusing people, goes against the trend for more local, regionally distinctive produce, and could lead to a dilution of organic standards.
‘Soil’ believe that this move from Brussels has more to do with championing the single European market and encouraging trade than promoting the benefits of organic farming. The principles and practices underlying organic standards are not, and never have been, about trading commodities, and unfortunately the minimum organic standards laid down by European law fall below the animal welfare requirements the Soil Association sets its own farmers and growers.
Read More:
http://www.ukipcornwall.org.uk/letters-to-the-editor/a-letter-to-the-editor · 129 days ago